Entries tagged 'cat:Child Abuse'

Mr. Robot Entry created on 2025-10-1 (edited 2025-10-20) Authors: steeph (365) Categories: Child Abuse (4) Delusion (1) Economics (1) Fight Club (1) Films (22) Hacking (1) Mental Health (2) Psychopathy (1) Schizophrenia (1) Split Personality (1) Languages used: en (254) Topics: Films (15) edit

I must admit I enjoyed watching Mr. Robot. I don't know exactly why I think that it is something that Ihave to admit to. Maybe because I suspect that there are plenty of critical reviews and opinions on it out there. I didn't check. I'm writing this without looking up what others think about it, what fans of it talk about and what connections and references I didn't get.

Mr. Robot is a series of 45 ~45 minute episodes in four seasons. The first one was released in 2015. It's about mental illnesses and neurodivercity, coorporate and world politics, hacking and the a world conspiracy.

Season 1

The first season has a lot of similarities with the book and movie Fight Club. I go so far to say it is a reinterpretation/rewrite of the Fight Club story but with a continuation. It is that heavily inspired by the story and the movie's unique narrative style. Watching it for the first time was as gripping and exciting as watching Fight Club for the first time. Some story elements from Fight Club are not in it but additional parts of the story make for a little bit more complex story. Watching it for the second time years later was like watching Fight Club for the second time: Highly entertaining and I knew the story so I could pay attention to more details. The main story element it has compared to Fight Club is all the hacking. A typical American action movie take on social engineering, IT security and vulnarability exploitation _but_ with the surprising feature of being realistic and not embarrassing. There's always enough being shown and explained to let the viewer know that Sam Esmail knew what he was writing about. Yes, maybe it's not realisitic in the way conversations always contain the right amount of keywords and explanations to enable a bystander (the viewer) to easily look up more information. Yes, the main character seems to have a memory, knowledge and hacking skills ptobably not many on this planet have and he is quick suspiciously quick in gaining access or information he requires at any point of the story. But it is way better than in almost any other movie while containing way more hacks and related jargon than almost any other movie and it is being acknowledged by the narrator that some things take more time than he is given.

Season 2

Season two contiunes the story to a great extend. The narrative style is refined to its own Mr. Robot way of talking to the viewer in different ways and tones through different characters or personalities. One character seems to have changed a bit as decisions were made to take the story into a certain direction. It is a worthy continuation, stays true to the character and, as I know now, prepares the story for more than the viewer would expect, without leaving gaps to fill or unknowns to answer by what's going to happen in futures seasons, with is also an achievement. In the second season the first hints to an upcoming shift in the story are placed. At that point they only cause confusion or create questions, which is very much in the spirit of the rest of the show so far.

Season 3

There is a lot in Season three to make you find yourself in a completely different place at the end and not recognise what was important in the first two seasons. That is how fast the story develops. It all makes sense though. Well, it's fiction, but it's consistent and logical. Even though the character of the show doesn't change during the season, there is technically a change of genre in season three. The viewer might not be aware of it, yet, or might not realise what certain statements mean, but the shift from hacking drama to science fiction has begun.

Season 4

Season four feels a bit different with several new characters and several old characters, whose stories had already finished, coming back with new stories. Sex and violence are upped for the last season. Hacking scenes do not occur as often.. The show becomes more like other American crime thrillers. But it does still feel like Mr. Robot. That is not the shift in genre I meant that makes this season special. I call it science fiction. Somebody else calls it paranormal. The project that, through connections with all substories of the show, caused everything that happened in season two and later, is very slowly being reveiled to the viewer. Not to spoil too much, just in case. But then everything turns out to be otherwise again, which is exactly the way you could have ecpected after knowing what you know about Elliot, and the last episode resembles an homage to Mr. Nobody more than one to Fight Club.

Camera Angles

The unusual camera angles that often introduce a new scene or change in scenery deserve a shout-out. I don't know how how this works in film, who decides on these shots. But whoever is responsible should be proud of them. They often highlight shapes or peaces of architecture by placing the camera vewry close to them, leaving only little space in the frame for the actual to take place in. But because those close objects and shapes are out of focus and not moving, you naturally view the small part of the frame where people are having a conversation. One scene dtarts by showing just a grey wall with a grey rubber knub, Then a door opens from out of frame and a women steps in. We don't see her face, but can recognise her from her coat and the long hair that reaches into the frame. She steps around something that is also no in frame, then sits on it. (It was a chair.) Now her face is placed perfectly in the frame in profile. Then after a seconds it cuts to the other person sitting at the other side of the table. We knew the roomm, who's in there and who's about to enter it. That makes the interesting composition all the more estimable. (I've never heard the word estimable. But dict.cc says it's a good fit. Whatever.)

Music

This is the first time I feel that way. But this sound track must be worth listening to on its own on any day. More than a few times a scene started with a song that fades into the background as the scene starts to have other sounds to be heard, like a conversation, and I wanted to continue to listen to the song. I'll have to check out some of those songs.

Transgender Character

By mentioning it here I might be breaking this excellent handling of the matter of a transgender character in the show being embedded in the story without ever mentioning it or making it the topic of any scene. But considering how bad the topic was handled in TV shows over the last decades, it is worth mentioning how matter-of-factly this subsidiary matter is included. She is shown presenting herself as a male and as a female in different contexts. And the first times she is referenced she is attributed the pronoun he simply because she is part of an anonymous hacker personality and people tend to assume they are male. As people learn more about her more and more people start to use "she". In a way the show includes her transition in the eyes of, well, not the public, exactly, but a the group of people we follow throughout the show.

Overall

I praise this show for various different things. Among it: Unique characters, good to very good actors (including a strong crying scene), a non-judgemental depiction of mental illness, a realistic amount of sex and romance for a story not about romance or sex (at least until the last season), recreating and adding to the cinematic style and story of Fight Club and more. The main thing for which I like the show though is its unique approach of using a coporate director's fraudulent decision, various mental health challanges of more than one character, a family drama, a disruptive revolution/economic crash, world politics, a worldwide conspiracy tale and lots of IT security substories to very elaborately introduce a science-fiction plot that in itself wouldn't have been new or very exciting/entertaining for long. That is what I like to see in it. What it is affter all and most of all is a portrait of a mentally ill IT security worker and his issues. A real review of the show should contain a lot of sentences about the dillusions, illusions, different personalities, drug habit, coping strategies, challenges, memory gaps and mental blanks of Elliot. I feel like many of these things are portrayed in a way one with similar problem could relate to. The topic of mental illness is certainly portrayed in a way I havent seen before. But I don't know enough to analise those aspects of the series.

Comment via email
Film: Tideland Entry created on 2023-01-17 (edited 2023-02-03) Authors: steeph (365) Categories: Adventure (2) Child Abuse (4) Children (4) Death (7) Decomposition (1) Drugs (1) Films (22) Languages used: en (254) Topics: Films (15) edit

I didn't think I could be entertained by watching a little girl being traumatised for life in various ways for almost two hours.

Is it a weird movie?

Why, yes. Yes, it is. That is if you consider a movie weird if it contains a scene of a corpse being taxidermied to keep a deceised person around then placed at the dinner table with the still living part of the family. But it is weird in that way without being a gory horror or torture movie.

Would Jean-Pierre Jeunet like this film?

I don't know Jean-Pierre Jeunet or what movies he likes. But Tideland reminded me of his movies' style very much. Camera work, colours, character weirdness, music and the naturalness of unusual events made me suspect that it may be intentionally a tribute to Jean-Pierre Jeunet's work. But that's a silly thought.

Is it a children's movie?

I never understood the criteria for which movies are considered children's movies and which are not. But this one might genuinly be impossible to classify as either. It seems to be a children's movie, telling the story of a child from her point of view, with imaginative play and all. But who would want to show such fucked up shit to a child? Well, actually, why not? Some other children's stories aren't any better. And some, like some of Grim's fairy tales, are more gory than this one.

Shouldn't you have started this with an explanation of what the movie is about?

No. But here are a few keywords: girl, heroin, child abuse, death, friendship, decomposition, mummification, family, adventure, imagination, innosence, love, lonelines

Why is Brendan Fletcher doing this weird retarded act?

I don't know but you can't say it's offensive because he's not actually portraying just a neurodiverse man but a man who has part of his brain removed. Still offensive but for different reasons? Well, okay. I guess not, since he has been complimented for a realisitc portrayal of a mentally challenged person. Anyway. I found his role quite nice and well acted.

So, is it a horror movie or isn't it?

Does it have a romance component in the story?

In an unusual, awkward way, yes, kind of. Well, calling it a romance would legitimise it. It's definitely not the usual cliché romance component. So, no. At least that's how I see it. Others are more open about admitting that a relationship between a child and a grown-up with a romantic component can still be a love story. By definition I agree. And I guess the film shows enough to talk about if you want to discuss the topic, but omits the more erotic parts from the book.

Oh, it's an adaptation of a book?

Yeah, but I haven't read it. It's also called Tideland. Mitch Cullin wrote it.

What is it that you like about it?

I don't know. I think like how different normalities of life circumstances are introduced without any inhibition or restraint in a somehow lighthearted seeming way. The innocent look on everything that happens.

And the consistancy in the changes throughout the story.

What is this movie a mix of?

I'd say Fear And Laughing In Las Vegas (Terry Gilliam) and The City Of The Lost Children (Jean-Pierre Jeunet). That's for the movie style. Terry Gilliam himself said Alice in Wonderland meets Psycho, which describes the story very well.

If you would have watched the film again, with the audio comment from Terry Gilliam after you wrote this entry, how would you have edited it?

I have amended some answers slightly and added one other question besides this one.

Can you show us some paradigmatic screen captures?

OK. But not from the end bit. Here you go.

File Attachments (15 files)
FilmTideland-01.jpeg (image/jpeg, 301942 B)
FilmTideland-01.jpeg (image/jpeg, 301942 B)
FilmTideland-02.jpeg (image/jpeg, 252344 B)
FilmTideland-02.jpeg (image/jpeg, 252344 B)
FilmTideland-03.jpeg (image/jpeg, 272728 B)
FilmTideland-03.jpeg (image/jpeg, 272728 B)
FilmTideland-04.jpeg (image/jpeg, 308350 B)
FilmTideland-04.jpeg (image/jpeg, 308350 B)
FilmTideland-05.jpeg (image/jpeg, 299089 B)
FilmTideland-05.jpeg (image/jpeg, 299089 B)
FilmTideland-06.jpeg (image/jpeg, 191497 B)
FilmTideland-06.jpeg (image/jpeg, 191497 B)
FilmTideland-07.jpeg (image/jpeg, 428693 B)
FilmTideland-07.jpeg (image/jpeg, 428693 B)
FilmTideland-08.jpeg (image/jpeg, 222823 B)
FilmTideland-08.jpeg (image/jpeg, 222823 B)
FilmTideland-09.jpeg (image/jpeg, 286293 B)
FilmTideland-09.jpeg (image/jpeg, 286293 B)
FilmTideland-10.jpeg (image/jpeg, 202724 B)
FilmTideland-10.jpeg (image/jpeg, 202724 B)
FilmTideland-11.jpeg (image/jpeg, 332705 B)
FilmTideland-11.jpeg (image/jpeg, 332705 B)
FilmTideland-12.jpeg (image/jpeg, 294398 B)
FilmTideland-12.jpeg (image/jpeg, 294398 B)
FilmTideland-13.jpeg (image/jpeg, 300698 B)
FilmTideland-13.jpeg (image/jpeg, 300698 B)
FilmTideland-14.jpeg (image/jpeg, 317902 B)
FilmTideland-14.jpeg (image/jpeg, 317902 B)
FilmTideland-15.jpeg (image/jpeg, 155038 B)
FilmTideland-15.jpeg (image/jpeg, 155038 B)
Comment via email
Film: Have Dreams, Will Travel Entry created on 2022-09-13 (edited 2022-10-08) Authors: steeph (365) Categories: Adventure (2) Child Abuse (4) Films (22) Travelling (1) Languages used: en (254) Topics: Films (15) edit

I don't know what the more correct title of the movie is. Some call it Have Dreams Will Travel, some call it A West Texas Children's Story and I don't know where either title was originally used.

It's about the adventure that Cassie and Ben have after her parents die and his don't even notice that he leaves without saying anything. It's also about trauma processing, communication in relationships (parental, friendships and romantic). That's what I see in it at least.

Cassie: I think it's time for us to leave.
Ben: Leave?
Cassie: Look. Those two people who you live with. They're nice and everything, but-
Ben: My parents?
Cassie: Right. But from what I can tell, they don't really have anything to offer you and they certainly don't have a thing to offer me.
Ben: So, where're we goin'?
Cassie: Baltimore. I have an aunt and uncle there. I haven't seen them since I was five but from what I can remember they're both extremely hip.

The overly compressed sound (accoustically compressed, not in terms of saving storage) is so cinematic that it's conspicuous for a movie made in this century. But it fits the overly grainy film-look and does a good job at creating this big-life-story vibe that dominates the whole movie. Like many dramas this movie has a recurring melody, creating a melodramatic yet optimistic mood.

The characters are so well defined at first that it almost came as a positive surprise that they both have deeper personalities. But I soon got used to the movie not becoming as comedic as I first thought it might be.

There is something about some of the dialogues that make them refreshing and simultaneously irregular for child characters and very fitting for these particular child characters.

Cassie: See, a real plan is more than just some pipe dream.
Ben: Pipe dream?
Cassie: A pipe dream is an unrealistic fantasy that deludes oneself into thinking that it's an actual plan. It's a very popular expression. I'm surprised you've never heard of it before.
Ben: I didn't say I'd never heard it.
Cassie: Anyway, a real plan is an actual goal that you believe in enough to create a set of circumstances. Which leads you to, and into, a plan. Comprende?
Ben: Where do you come up with this stuff? I mean, what part of your brain works so hard it makes you think and talk like that?
Cassie: My father was a professor with a very wide vocabulary and lots of unique ideas. When he wasn't teaching his students, he taught me.
Ben: So what does your mom do?
Cassie: She never did anything.

The last line of that quote may have a different meaning that I thought when I watched the movie for the first time.

The fact that I was surprised by the dramatic loss of Cassie's facade later on may make me naive, but for me it just means that I got a non-obvious important change of the story route. And it's nice to get a story told with a non-obvious route. Whether that's because you're tired, three, stupid, naive or because of excellent writing doesn't really matter. Other viewers may have been able to deduct more about Cassie early on than I was, with her efforts to do things in grown-up ways. I didn't even know what Ben meant when he asked Cassie what she's hiding. That just created all the more potential to be sucked in by emotions to be discovered by my naive movie-drama graving brain.

Over time I think Ben proved that he is the more grown-up one in the relationship. Not by having a large vocabulary or a life plan, but by simply addressing the issue he sees.

In the end, Ben makes his parents choose (in a away) what's more important for them to have - their passionate hobbies or their son - and decides for them at the same time. The result is the most glorious mixing of (fake) sad cry tears with (fake) happy cry tears I've seen in a mov- anywhere really.

I sort of expected this movie to end without any closure. It seemed like one of these movies. But not only did it have a closure for Ben's parents and a happy ending for his part of the story. It even has a happier ending above and after that, depicting the best possible futures Cassie and Ben could have perceived to have together. An utopistic extra happy ending that I didn't see necessary. I keep saying that I'd like to see more movies without a happy ending. This one has two but also shows that a movie can still be as emotional and melodramatic as it is even with a double happy endling. Maybe they felt they needed to quickly tell how happy they both end up in the future so that no viewer with a similar life story or trauma kills themselves after watching the movie.

I think it's interesting that AnnaSophia Robb (Cassie) isn't seen more in movies as an adult now. She has this sort of model face that men find so beautiful and she can act, I think. Maybe she's working more as a model. Cayden Boyd too. He looks like a model for a shaver commercial now. But he only had some small TV show roles in recent years. I haven't seen him in any other role. Maybe he sucks at acting.

File Attachments (2 files)
This is where the film could have ended in my opinion. But what do I know?
This is where the film could have ended in my opinion. But what do I know?
"Who knows anything when it comes down to it? I don't. Actually, contrary to what I wrote above this scene is much more open than I first thought. They don't meet Ben's parents. Both parents go inside without seeing the children. To me that seems like they may have never met again, or not until years later maybe. But what do I know?
"Who knows anything when it comes down to it? I don't. Actually, contrary to what I wrote above this scene is much more open than I first thought. They don't meet Ben's parents. Both parents go inside without seeing the children. To me that seems like they may have never met again, or not until years later maybe. But what do I know?
Comment via email
Film: Schande Entry Permalink (edited 2020-03-06) Authors: steeph (365) Categories: Abuse (1) Child Abuse (4) Children (4) Death (7) Films (22) Sexual Abuse (1) TV Film (1) Languages used: de (88) Topics: Films (15) edit

Ich finde ja, es sollte mehr Filme ohne Happyend oder wenigstens ohne offensichtliches Happyend geben. "Schande" (mittlereweile verlinke ich lieber auf Letterboxd.) ist ein Film, bei dem schon ziemlich früh klar wird, dass es kein Happyend geben kann (oder ein solches sehr konstruiert erscheinen müsste). Und trotzdem zeigt sein Ende, dass der Ausgangs einer solchen Geschichte nicht ohne Überraschung auskommen muss. Sein Ende ist zwar sein emotionaler Höhepunkt, aber auch der Rest der Geschichte hat es geschafft, mich zu bewegen, was ich einem Film immer hoch anrechne. Der Film handelt von einem Mädchen, das sexuell missbraucht wird, der Suche nach der Wahrheit und davon, wie die Familie im einzelnen und im Ganzen mit der Aufdeckung umgeht.

Als deutscher Fernsehfilm ohne DVD-Veröffentlichung zählt der Film nicht zu den besonders leicht im Internet zu findenden. Ob sich eine Suche lohnt überlasse ich jedem selbst. "Es ist aber ein Fernsehfilm" kann gleichermaßen als Hinweis Vorab auf einen von den großen Produktionen abweichenden Stil und auf einen im Vergleich zu häufiger empfohlenen Filmen niedrigeren Qualitätsanspruch angesehen werden. Also quasi als Warnung und Ausrede zugleich. Aber ich finde, dass auch Filme mit sehr guten anstatt mit überwiegend sehr sehr sehr guten Schauspielern, Filme mit kleinem Budget, geschrieben und geführt von Menschen mit wenig Erfahrung und Filme, deren Macher Ideen, die sich den gelehrten Erkenntnissen, wie etwas zu machen ist, widersetzen, oft einen Wert haben, der ihren Bekanntheitsgrad und ihre Online-Bewertungen übersteigt, weil zum Beispiel Ideen ausgesprochen, Konzepte ausprobiert oder mit dem Wegfall oder der Überarbeitung von Traditionen experimentiert wird. So sehe ich diesen Film also. Als Beispiel, wie eine Spannungskurve auch funktionieren kann. Und ich finde, dass sie funktioniert hat. Ich meine: Wer sich einen Film mit einer Geschichte über sexuellen Kindesmissbrauch anschaut und dem einen Unterhaltungswert irgendeiner Art abgewinnen kann, der wird vermutlich auch dieser Art des Emotion Grabbings etwas abgewinnen können.

Comment via email
Go To Navigation Page
Show/Hide Navigation
Mastodon