Entries tagged 'author:steeph' (Page 12)

Pictures of Artemia Entry created on 2022-10-08 (edited 2023-02-14) Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Animals (2) Artemia (1) Photos (29) edit

CC0 licence logo
To the extent possible under law, steeph has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work.

Although I rarely do it, I like taking makro pictures. These Artemia posed for me over 12 years ago. Their tribe started at the end of the summer 2010 and it still exists today, in the same tank. That's all I know.

File Attachments (5 files)
artemia-20100915_1215972892.jpg (image/jpeg, 133085 B)
artemia-20100915_1215972892.jpg (image/jpeg, 133085 B)
artemia-20100915_1249609230.jpg (image/jpeg, 140173 B)
artemia-20100915_1249609230.jpg (image/jpeg, 140173 B)
artemia-20100915_1521241869.jpg (image/jpeg, 244681 B)
artemia-20100915_1521241869.jpg (image/jpeg, 244681 B)
artemia-20100915_1696823847.jpg (image/jpeg, 326510 B)
artemia-20100915_1696823847.jpg (image/jpeg, 326510 B)
artemia-20100915_2006888863.jpg (image/jpeg, 641935 B)
artemia-20100915_2006888863.jpg (image/jpeg, 641935 B)
Comment via email
GalaCon 2013 Entry created on 2023-02-14 Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Events (22) GalaCon (4) My Little Pony (10) Photos (29) Languages used: en (255) Topics: Events → Conventions (4) Events → My Little Pony (6) edit

CC0 licence logo
To the extent possible under law, steeph has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work.

The second GalaCon, the first one in Ludwigsburg, and the first one at which I had a vendor table. I was selling only handmade LED pictures. Only one kind, wobbly base that likely didn't hold the acrylic sheet for very long. And I had only two engraved blocks. But people loved those. Peter New took and posted a picture of one of them. Anyway, the con was so nice! Most of the traditions that we now have at GalaCon started in 2013 and 2014. It was smaller than 2014 till 2022. Everybody was so so nice!

File Attachments (30 files)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8306.jpeg (image/jpeg, 385337 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8306.jpeg (image/jpeg, 385337 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8313.jpeg (image/jpeg, 380316 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8313.jpeg (image/jpeg, 380316 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8314.jpeg (image/jpeg, 697241 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8314.jpeg (image/jpeg, 697241 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8315.jpeg (image/jpeg, 431287 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8315.jpeg (image/jpeg, 431287 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8323.jpeg (image/jpeg, 417271 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8323.jpeg (image/jpeg, 417271 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8324.jpeg (image/jpeg, 400517 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8324.jpeg (image/jpeg, 400517 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8332.jpeg (image/jpeg, 521629 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8332.jpeg (image/jpeg, 521629 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8334.jpeg (image/jpeg, 573301 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8334.jpeg (image/jpeg, 573301 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8338.jpeg (image/jpeg, 341887 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8338.jpeg (image/jpeg, 341887 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8340.jpeg (image/jpeg, 579082 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8340.jpeg (image/jpeg, 579082 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8344.jpeg (image/jpeg, 906127 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8344.jpeg (image/jpeg, 906127 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8346.jpeg (image/jpeg, 838924 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8346.jpeg (image/jpeg, 838924 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8349.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1125130 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8349.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1125130 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8358.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1227844 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8358.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1227844 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8367.jpeg (image/jpeg, 252936 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8367.jpeg (image/jpeg, 252936 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8377.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1710729 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8377.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1710729 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8381.jpeg (image/jpeg, 355443 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8381.jpeg (image/jpeg, 355443 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8401.jpeg (image/jpeg, 466244 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8401.jpeg (image/jpeg, 466244 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8403.jpeg (image/jpeg, 608770 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8403.jpeg (image/jpeg, 608770 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8406.jpeg (image/jpeg, 499233 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8406.jpeg (image/jpeg, 499233 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8407.jpeg (image/jpeg, 578518 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8407.jpeg (image/jpeg, 578518 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8410.jpeg (image/jpeg, 859527 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8410.jpeg (image/jpeg, 859527 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8415.jpeg (image/jpeg, 841908 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8415.jpeg (image/jpeg, 841908 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8418.jpeg (image/jpeg, 817161 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8418.jpeg (image/jpeg, 817161 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8423.jpeg (image/jpeg, 789366 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8423.jpeg (image/jpeg, 789366 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8424.jpeg (image/jpeg, 873568 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8424.jpeg (image/jpeg, 873568 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8425.jpeg (image/jpeg, 728518 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8425.jpeg (image/jpeg, 728518 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8427.jpeg (image/jpeg, 429513 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8427.jpeg (image/jpeg, 429513 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8428.jpeg (image/jpeg, 439729 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8428.jpeg (image/jpeg, 439729 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8429.jpeg (image/jpeg, 653209 B)
GalaCon 2013-IMG_8429.jpeg (image/jpeg, 653209 B)
Comment via email
1st Grand Galloping Gala Entry created on 2023-02-14 Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Bronies (2) Events (22) My Little Pony (10) Pictures (61) Languages used: en (255) Topics: Events → Conventions (4) Events → My Little Pony (6) edit

CC0 licence logo
To the extent possible under law, steeph has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work.

The first GalaCon took place in 2012 in Stuttgart at a far far smaller venue than in following years. There were intentionally only a few hundret (I think it may have been arounf 200) tickets sold as to not have a big event as the first experience for the organisers. The following GalaCon was larger, after that the available tickets weren't sold out because the venue was really big. But this first one was really small for a fan convention. I think probably most visitors (or at least me) didn't know what to expect from the event and so every expectation was met. There were nice people. I had a professionally done rainbow-colored mohawk (and two people took pictures of it but I didn't have anybody take a good one for myself) and lots of fun was had. There was a lot of time with no panel, show, game, workshop or talk. There aleady was a gathering outside of the venue of people who didn't get in. There was beer and loud rock music (as opposed to inside) and we agreed to have a "Real Event" (as opposed to the one inside) in the coming years as wel. But we didn't exchange contact details and I forgot everybody's nicknames. (But there were such rogue fan gatherings with nice punk and non-punk beings outsode every following GalaCon and they became bigger, too.) I didn't take a camera to the first GalaCon (or Grand Gallopping Gala, as it was still called). But here are a few pictures that I took.

File Attachments (13 files)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-BREAKING_-_PINKIE_PIE_NOT_SMILING.jpeg (image/jpeg, 748603 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-BREAKING_-_PINKIE_PIE_NOT_SMILING.jpeg (image/jpeg, 748603 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8115.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1183751 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8115.jpeg (image/jpeg, 1183751 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8213.jpeg (image/jpeg, 708045 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8213.jpeg (image/jpeg, 708045 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8214.jpeg (image/jpeg, 865959 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8214.jpeg (image/jpeg, 865959 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8239.jpeg (image/jpeg, 585640 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-IMG_8239.jpeg (image/jpeg, 585640 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-cadance1.jpg (image/jpeg, 617209 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-cadance1.jpg (image/jpeg, 617209 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-cadance2.jpg (image/jpeg, 481673 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-cadance2.jpg (image/jpeg, 481673 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-canni.jpg (image/jpeg, 336200 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-canni.jpg (image/jpeg, 336200 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-derpy.jpg (image/jpeg, 427482 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-derpy.jpg (image/jpeg, 427482 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-glass.jpg (image/jpeg, 622378 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-glass.jpg (image/jpeg, 622378 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-luna.jpg (image/jpeg, 256250 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-luna.jpg (image/jpeg, 256250 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-pinkamina.jpg (image/jpeg, 189336 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-pinkamina.jpg (image/jpeg, 189336 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-pinkie1.jpg (image/jpeg, 646470 B)
1st Grand Galloping Gala-pinkie1.jpg (image/jpeg, 646470 B)
Comment via email
Film: Womb (2010) Entry created on 2023-02-05 Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Death (7) Films (22) Incest (1) Languages used: en (255) edit

What three words come to your mind first that describe the film?

Soft, Love, Incest. Well, to be honest, those are the first three. I wish the third one would have been a different word. The forth one would have been Sci-Fi. More keywords are: cloning, childhood, ostracization, ocean, death, depression

How does the film end?

The scene that is shown first in the film is chronologically the last scene in the story. So, that's how the story ends. The rest of the film creates the meaning of what is seen and what she sais in that first scene.

Which two movies is this one a mix of?

Kind of Birth (2004) and Be Right Back (2014, Black Mirror epispde). It's not the same story as Birth. But if you've seen it you will notice the similarities, about which I don't want to tell too much here. Maybe even more so for Be Right Back.

How does that melody go?

DING DING DING DING. ding DING DING DING DING. ding DING DING DING DING DING ding. DING DING DING DING ding. ding ding DING DING DING DING … It's a mostly slow movie. This slow melody sets or accompanies the mood during moments where nothing happens, like during scenery shots. I can't forget that melody. Actually, the melody doesn't reaccur after the beginning of the story. (The instrument does, though.) But still, I can't forget that melody.

Why is Doctor Who there?

Matt Smith is the name of the actor. I see hom so rarely in roles other than The Doctor. This is an entirely different sort of science fition. He still did good.

What open questions remain at the end of the movie?

Why is the new Thomas physically atracted to Rebecca when he only knows her as his mother? How will the new Thomas's life be like after he knows?

Would you watch it again two weeks later because it's a good movie and can be enjoyed twice?

Yes. And I Have.

What's the overall mood of the movie?

I'd say: peaceful. Not every scene and everything that happens is peaceful. But most of the time that's the prevelant mood that I got from it.

You said love is one of the themes of the film. What sort of love story is it?

Well, I didn't use those words. But alright. Was it true love, love at first sight, first love and the love of her life all at the same time? If so then I'm counting it as an achievement that the film told the story without getting cheesy. The following relationships are adressed: childhood friendship, young love, son - mother, mother - son (erotic). Shown but not really addressed much are those: one-night stand, grandfather - granddoughter parents - dead son.

File Attachments (33 files)
FilmWomb-00.jpeg (image/jpeg, 59822 B)
FilmWomb-00.jpeg (image/jpeg, 59822 B)
FilmWomb-01.jpeg (image/jpeg, 44263 B)
FilmWomb-01.jpeg (image/jpeg, 44263 B)
FilmWomb-02.jpeg (image/jpeg, 54835 B)
FilmWomb-02.jpeg (image/jpeg, 54835 B)
FilmWomb-03.jpeg (image/jpeg, 53715 B)
FilmWomb-03.jpeg (image/jpeg, 53715 B)
FilmWomb-04.jpeg (image/jpeg, 53765 B)
FilmWomb-04.jpeg (image/jpeg, 53765 B)
FilmWomb-05.jpeg (image/jpeg, 58959 B)
FilmWomb-05.jpeg (image/jpeg, 58959 B)
FilmWomb-06.jpeg (image/jpeg, 83475 B)
FilmWomb-06.jpeg (image/jpeg, 83475 B)
FilmWomb-07.jpeg (image/jpeg, 88238 B)
FilmWomb-07.jpeg (image/jpeg, 88238 B)
FilmWomb-09.jpeg (image/jpeg, 117795 B)
FilmWomb-09.jpeg (image/jpeg, 117795 B)
FilmWomb-10.jpeg (image/jpeg, 57814 B)
FilmWomb-10.jpeg (image/jpeg, 57814 B)
FilmWomb-11.jpeg (image/jpeg, 28017 B)
FilmWomb-11.jpeg (image/jpeg, 28017 B)
FilmWomb-12.jpeg (image/jpeg, 61440 B)
FilmWomb-12.jpeg (image/jpeg, 61440 B)
FilmWomb-13.jpeg (image/jpeg, 61593 B)
FilmWomb-13.jpeg (image/jpeg, 61593 B)
s
s
FilmWomb-15.jpeg (image/jpeg, 53990 B)
FilmWomb-15.jpeg (image/jpeg, 53990 B)
FilmWomb-16.jpeg (image/jpeg, 48387 B)
FilmWomb-16.jpeg (image/jpeg, 48387 B)
FilmWomb-17.jpeg (image/jpeg, 40538 B)
FilmWomb-17.jpeg (image/jpeg, 40538 B)
FilmWomb-18.jpeg (image/jpeg, 46961 B)
FilmWomb-18.jpeg (image/jpeg, 46961 B)
FilmWomb-19.jpeg (image/jpeg, 33599 B)
FilmWomb-19.jpeg (image/jpeg, 33599 B)
FilmWomb-20.jpeg (image/jpeg, 75259 B)
FilmWomb-20.jpeg (image/jpeg, 75259 B)
FilmWomb-21.jpeg (image/jpeg, 67192 B)
FilmWomb-21.jpeg (image/jpeg, 67192 B)
FilmWomb-22.jpeg (image/jpeg, 67163 B)
FilmWomb-22.jpeg (image/jpeg, 67163 B)
FilmWomb-23.jpeg (image/jpeg, 91871 B)
FilmWomb-23.jpeg (image/jpeg, 91871 B)
FilmWomb-24.jpeg (image/jpeg, 33529 B)
FilmWomb-24.jpeg (image/jpeg, 33529 B)
FilmWomb-25.jpeg (image/jpeg, 98702 B)
FilmWomb-25.jpeg (image/jpeg, 98702 B)
FilmWomb-26.jpeg (image/jpeg, 69776 B)
FilmWomb-26.jpeg (image/jpeg, 69776 B)
FilmWomb-27.jpeg (image/jpeg, 72001 B)
FilmWomb-27.jpeg (image/jpeg, 72001 B)
FilmWomb-28.jpeg (image/jpeg, 77038 B)
FilmWomb-28.jpeg (image/jpeg, 77038 B)
FilmWomb-29.jpeg (image/jpeg, 18800 B)
FilmWomb-29.jpeg (image/jpeg, 18800 B)
FilmWomb-30.jpeg (image/jpeg, 47687 B)
FilmWomb-30.jpeg (image/jpeg, 47687 B)
FilmWomb-31.jpeg (image/jpeg, 81741 B)
FilmWomb-31.jpeg (image/jpeg, 81741 B)
FilmWomb-32.jpeg (image/jpeg, 63136 B)
FilmWomb-32.jpeg (image/jpeg, 63136 B)
FilmWomb-33.jpeg (image/jpeg, 48307 B)
FilmWomb-33.jpeg (image/jpeg, 48307 B)
Comment via email
SBWG 0.11.1 Entry created on 2023-02-04 Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Bash (31) Code (31) Computer (78) Linux (35) Projects (41) SBWG (18) Scripts (28) Software (52) Languages used: en (255) Topics: Projects → Code → Bash Scripts → SBWG (16) edit

I'm glad to have this version done and published. Even though it has new features compared to the last published version, I've used it enough to feel relatively comfortable saying it is also more stable and has fewer bugs than the last version. There are known bugs still left. But those aren't new.

Caching options and settings are slowly getting a bit elaborate, but also close to what I imagined them being able to do. There are new cachegroups and parts of entries can now be chosed as individual cachegroups, giving the user more control over what is cached and what caches are used. The lifetime of caches can now be set to make sure that no matter how the caching options are used, no outdated content, tags, attachments, etc. will stay on the web site for too long because cache files have been forgotten to be purges. The cache lifetime can be chosen from 1 second to unfinite. The directory used for persistant caches can now be chosen via command line option. I think the caching options are now in a state in which they can seriously be used reliably. Changes to existing cachegroups, like in previous versions, will probably not be made anymore. Just more cachegroups will be added.

The README file has grown a lot. Not only from new features and options. It's now also more complete. A lot of bugs have been fixed. And some general little code quality improvements took place. The stylesheets of the example web site have been improved a bit.

The messaging and logging system has been completely rewritten. It's not really an important part of the script and strictly doesn't matter for its functionality at all. But I decided to have a messaging system and a logging option that doesn't rely on shell redirects. So I did want to redo it properly. Different message types can now be redirected using file descriptors. The option parser has also been party re-written. It's approaching a state in which it's close to what I think personally a complete option parser for Bash should be like.

Alternate styles can now be defined in a web site's settings file. That way alternate style sheets will be offered to the web browser. If the browser supports alternate style sheets, the visitor can select from them to view the page in a different style. There is now an option to change the tagstyle, enabling a web site to have tags of the same type grouped for a more readable look of the entries' headers. Tags now show in parenthesis the number of entries that carry that tag. The number of file attachments is also displayed below entries.

The options for generating a single entry, page or gallery that is not located in the input directory/isn't actually part of the web site can now be used. They were very buggy or nonexistant before. Entries (and other items) with duplicate names are handled in defined ways now. Text files can now be used as file attachments to entries. But if the script determines one to look like a SBWG source file, it is omitted/not displayed/not linked to.

There are still big plans for future versions. Small and big features as well as a complete re-thinking of how the input directory is structured. Nicer looking web sites, more flexible command line options, more options for speeding up the script in cases where a complete website is updated/re-built. A pause like the one before this release will probably occur more often in the future.

Comment via email
Film: Tideland Entry created on 2023-01-17 (edited 2023-02-03) Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Adventure (2) Child Abuse (4) Children (4) Death (7) Decomposition (1) Drugs (1) Films (22) Languages used: en (255) Topics: Films (15) edit

I didn't think I could be entertained by watching a little girl being traumatised for life in various ways for almost two hours.

Is it a weird movie?

Why, yes. Yes, it is. That is if you consider a movie weird if it contains a scene of a corpse being taxidermied to keep a deceised person around then placed at the dinner table with the still living part of the family. But it is weird in that way without being a gory horror or torture movie.

Would Jean-Pierre Jeunet like this film?

I don't know Jean-Pierre Jeunet or what movies he likes. But Tideland reminded me of his movies' style very much. Camera work, colours, character weirdness, music and the naturalness of unusual events made me suspect that it may be intentionally a tribute to Jean-Pierre Jeunet's work. But that's a silly thought.

Is it a children's movie?

I never understood the criteria for which movies are considered children's movies and which are not. But this one might genuinly be impossible to classify as either. It seems to be a children's movie, telling the story of a child from her point of view, with imaginative play and all. But who would want to show such fucked up shit to a child? Well, actually, why not? Some other children's stories aren't any better. And some, like some of Grim's fairy tales, are more gory than this one.

Shouldn't you have started this with an explanation of what the movie is about?

No. But here are a few keywords: girl, heroin, child abuse, death, friendship, decomposition, mummification, family, adventure, imagination, innosence, love, lonelines

Why is Brendan Fletcher doing this weird retarded act?

I don't know but you can't say it's offensive because he's not actually portraying just a neurodiverse man but a man who has part of his brain removed. Still offensive but for different reasons? Well, okay. I guess not, since he has been complimented for a realisitc portrayal of a mentally challenged person. Anyway. I found his role quite nice and well acted.

So, is it a horror movie or isn't it?

Does it have a romance component in the story?

In an unusual, awkward way, yes, kind of. Well, calling it a romance would legitimise it. It's definitely not the usual cliché romance component. So, no. At least that's how I see it. Others are more open about admitting that a relationship between a child and a grown-up with a romantic component can still be a love story. By definition I agree. And I guess the film shows enough to talk about if you want to discuss the topic, but omits the more erotic parts from the book.

Oh, it's an adaptation of a book?

Yeah, but I haven't read it. It's also called Tideland. Mitch Cullin wrote it.

What is it that you like about it?

I don't know. I think like how different normalities of life circumstances are introduced without any inhibition or restraint in a somehow lighthearted seeming way. The innocent look on everything that happens.

And the consistancy in the changes throughout the story.

What is this movie a mix of?

I'd say Fear And Laughing In Las Vegas (Terry Gilliam) and The City Of The Lost Children (Jean-Pierre Jeunet). That's for the movie style. Terry Gilliam himself said Alice in Wonderland meets Psycho, which describes the story very well.

If you would have watched the film again, with the audio comment from Terry Gilliam after you wrote this entry, how would you have edited it?

I have amended some answers slightly and added one other question besides this one.

Can you show us some paradigmatic screen captures?

OK. But not from the end bit. Here you go.

File Attachments (15 files)
FilmTideland-01.jpeg (image/jpeg, 301942 B)
FilmTideland-01.jpeg (image/jpeg, 301942 B)
FilmTideland-02.jpeg (image/jpeg, 252344 B)
FilmTideland-02.jpeg (image/jpeg, 252344 B)
FilmTideland-03.jpeg (image/jpeg, 272728 B)
FilmTideland-03.jpeg (image/jpeg, 272728 B)
FilmTideland-04.jpeg (image/jpeg, 308350 B)
FilmTideland-04.jpeg (image/jpeg, 308350 B)
FilmTideland-05.jpeg (image/jpeg, 299089 B)
FilmTideland-05.jpeg (image/jpeg, 299089 B)
FilmTideland-06.jpeg (image/jpeg, 191497 B)
FilmTideland-06.jpeg (image/jpeg, 191497 B)
FilmTideland-07.jpeg (image/jpeg, 428693 B)
FilmTideland-07.jpeg (image/jpeg, 428693 B)
FilmTideland-08.jpeg (image/jpeg, 222823 B)
FilmTideland-08.jpeg (image/jpeg, 222823 B)
FilmTideland-09.jpeg (image/jpeg, 286293 B)
FilmTideland-09.jpeg (image/jpeg, 286293 B)
FilmTideland-10.jpeg (image/jpeg, 202724 B)
FilmTideland-10.jpeg (image/jpeg, 202724 B)
FilmTideland-11.jpeg (image/jpeg, 332705 B)
FilmTideland-11.jpeg (image/jpeg, 332705 B)
FilmTideland-12.jpeg (image/jpeg, 294398 B)
FilmTideland-12.jpeg (image/jpeg, 294398 B)
FilmTideland-13.jpeg (image/jpeg, 300698 B)
FilmTideland-13.jpeg (image/jpeg, 300698 B)
FilmTideland-14.jpeg (image/jpeg, 317902 B)
FilmTideland-14.jpeg (image/jpeg, 317902 B)
FilmTideland-15.jpeg (image/jpeg, 155038 B)
FilmTideland-15.jpeg (image/jpeg, 155038 B)
Comment via email
Planet Computers' Astro Slide Entry created on 2023-01-02 (edited 2023-01-16) Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Android (4) Batteries (7) Buggy (1) Computer (78) Crowdfunding (4) Debian (1) Displays (5) Hands-On (3) Hardware (16) Keyboards (10) PDAs (2) Planet Computers (2) Psion (1) Smartphones (4) Software Update (1) Languages used: en (255) edit

I've finally received my Astro Slide. A smartphone with a physical keyboard that came out of a crowdfunding campaign that I've backed a few years ago. This entry contains my first impressions of the device, in the context of having used and having been disappointed by both its predecessors.

Specifications

Display6.53 inches, 2340 x 1080 pixels
ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 800 (4 x Cortex-A76 + 4 X Cortex-A55)
GPUARM Mali-G57 MC4
RAM8 GB LPDDR4x
Storage128 GB
Cameras48 MP rear, 13 MP front
SpeakersStereo
Ports2 x USB-C, 3.5 mm audio, microSD card slot
Wireless5G, WiFi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, FM radio, GPS, GLONASS
Battery3.500 mAh
Charging10W Wireless + wired fast charging
BiometricsFingerprint sensor in power button
Keyboard53 keys, slide-out, backlit
Dimensions164 mm x 76.6 mm x 15 mm
Weight300 g

Planet Computers

Planet Computers has created/produced and is selling three PDAs/smartphones with keyboards (Gemini PDA, Cosmo Communicator, Astro Slide). That's their legacy - smartphones of the clamshell kind (or slide-out in case of the new model, the Astro Slide) similar to the Psion Series 5. The form factor and keyboard of all three those devices is remarkably similar to this 1997 PDA. The opening mechanisms aren't. But enough about previous devices. Maybe I'll write about those two, since they are relatively unique devices.

Crowdfunding period

You can skip this and the next paragraph if you just want to know about the device and not my experience of getting it and my opinion on the crowdfunding process. The Indiegogo campaign ended in May 2020. Mass shipping of the produced devices was delayed until the end of December 2022 for various reasons. There was an availability/alleged scamming issue with important parts, forcing a redesign of the board including a switch to a different SoC. There were the usual discrepancies between time planned and actual time needed to finish steps. And there was a long series of problems caused directly or indirectly by the COVID19 pandemic. There was (and continues to be) a fucking huge pile of negativity and hostility towards the maker of the device. Maybe you know the sort of comments delayed crowdfunding campaigns tend to get. My impression is that people regret giving their money to a company as an investment with no security, lose hope to receive the device as expected, and then start to badmouth everything about the project and insult people who continue to support the company behind the project. I don't read much of the comments on campaigns that I'm not supporting. But I've never seen so much hate and unnecessary negativity for a fucking tech gadget. I'll refrain from repeating any details or telling any stories that don't have a point. But I wanted to mention it.

My personal take on the long waiting period: The stated delivery date at the time of backing was never realistic. Even the date to which it was later changed, or the one after that weren't to be expected to be the actual dates at which any devices would be delivered. Every tech gadget crowdfunding I've ever seen missed their delivery target date. But of course people will expect or pretend to expect to receive it before the stated date because that is precisely the purpose of stating that date. Anyway, most of the announced delays were sort of understandable in the current situation; even though Planet Computers surely didn't tell the (whole) truth all the time and their often denounced lack of communication skills is undeniable although not as big as purported by some. Instead of checking and filling the comments page weekly for two years, myself and other people who also didn't channel all their hatred into that page just didn't complain in the comments and still received the same device at the same time as the others. Although one good thing came of the complaining of some on the comments page: When a picture of a prototype or render or something (I don't remember) was shown in an update and people complained about the space between the feet not being filled with battery, Planet Computers made a poll that ended up showing that most backers want an even thicker device than it would have already become, and the design was changed to fill the last gaps with a bigger battery. Communication as a customer with them never feels great. They try to evade warranty claims, ignore questions and arguably lie if they feel that the response sounds better that way. My contribution through Indiegogo was locked for many weeks without an update. I moved house before shipping actually started. So I couldn't update my address on my own but had to send Planet Computers a message instead. They claimed to have updated it (ignoring other questions), but over a week later it was sent to the old address. Gladly UPS really tries to fulfil their task to the utmost satisfaction of the recipient.

Unpacking

At first I wasn't sure whether I even wanted to open the package. Because by I'm already waiting for another device that I discovered after backing the Astro Slide campaign but expect to like better than the Astro Slide. I shortly considered selling it unopened. But whatever, I wanted a treat now, not wait a few weeks for a better one. The packaging is of the sort that we have to come to expect from electronics gear that's not of the lowest price and quality. Nice, thick cardboard and not the simplest box design imaginable. I don't really appreciate this packaging the way others do. When getting everything out of the box, the bottom tray came out too. It obviously used to be glued in but ripped out with force. Also the holder for the SIM tray opening tool was damaged. If the box hadn't been sealed by a thick round transparent sticker, I'd say this box was opened before. Anyway, the device looked fine. When I turned it on I was surprised to find that it was already set up and the language was set to Japanese. Not the most obvious choice for a device with a EU charger and a German keyboard. It really seems to me like somebody else has received and tried out this device before.

Hands-On, Keyboard

My first impression is: It's thick and heavy, as we wished for in the poll. I don't mind that. It's supposed to be a tool, a PDA, not competition for the iPhone or not something to impress people with. The sliding mechanism is new. Both folding mechanisms of Planet Computers' previous devices didn't last long in my hands (or pocket). So I'm curious to find out whether this new approach works better. In the videos it looked more awkward to open than it really it. It's hardly possible to open with only one hand, but it's possible if you absolutely have to. And I think it would become even quite easy and less awkward as long as your hands are at least of average size. It's less fumbly to close with one hand though. After only a few tries of opening it with two hands I got the hang of it and I can do it quickly, without the edge getting stuck in the keys and looking really cool. Maybe that success is due to me using it too violently. But it doesn't feel like I'm straining or pressing anything in a way I shouldn't. So before I've actually used it for a while I'd say the new mechanism feels better than the old one. The keyboard layout is the same as with their previous devices: very much inspired by the Psion Series 5 PDAs from 1997 (and other similar PDAs from that time). For some unapparent reason they've changed the size of some keys though (Left Shift, Left Ctrl, Up, Down). The keys feel more firm than on my Cosmo Communicator, except those on the edges of the keyboard. During my first few tries typing text on it this feels better than with the Cosmo or the Gemini. But my main issue persists: Keys often to very often get stuck. Not in their pressed-down state. Rather they refuse to move down if hit in the wrong angle. When touch-typing on a too small keyboard, one hits the keys in all sorts of angles though. But beyond that I don't want to judge the typing experience. I find it too small for two-handed typing and it's too big and not made for thumb-typing. It takes quite some getting used to or training to type fast and reliably on it. But that's not the fault of the device. I'm sure it must have been the same with the Psion 5. Compared to most high-quality laptop keyboards the Astro's feels a bit cheap in that the keys don't travel consistently straight downwards depending on the angle from which they are pressed. When typing quickly and carelessly, keys sometimes can feel like the got stuck on their way down. But the key press usually gets registered, so that might not matter after getting used to typing on this keyboard. The experience is very similar, if not the same, to typing on a brand new Cosmo Communicator. The space key for some reason feels like it has hardly any travel. But it works well when actually typing text. The bugs that were there in the previous devices haven't been addressed. There's still ghosting when pressing more than two keys, caps lock still sometimes gets enabled accidentally and the caps lock light still sometimes is off when caps lock is on and vice versa.

First few minutestimes trying it out

A certain standard for features, form factor and quality has became standard for smartphones. The form factor of the Astro Slide is obviously different. The technical features can be looked up in the table above. For the perceived quality and experience I'll just list things that I found noteworthy during the first few times using the device. When the device is close, the screen flashes to maximum brightness every time it turns on. The display can not be turned off while the device is opened. It turns off after the set time of inactivity. There is now automatic screen rotation based on the device orientation, like in any other smart phone since the iPhone. But more prominently placed, there is also a setting in the pull-down menu that lets the user switch between landscape and portrait mode as long as the device is closed. When it is opened, the setting is ignored and the screen is set to landscape mode. When the device is closed again, the setting gets changed to portrait mode regardless of what it was before opening or while open. The lock screen is always in portrait mode when closed and always in landscape mode when opened. That mess needs to get sorted out. But, as long as you only ever want to use the Astro Slide in portrait mode when closed and only ever use it in landscape mode when opened, it should be fine. Except when booting the device while it's opened. Then the screen is in portrait mode and can only be changed by closing and opening it again. This could be done properly. But since it's not, having two separate automatic screen rotations (based on opening/closing the device and based on orientation) plus a manual setting may have been the wrong choice.

There is a notification from "System Update" with the title "System Update" and the message "System Update" that's almost always present. Sometimes it disappears for a short while, then it comes back. It can't be dismissed, opened, turned off or blocked. I bet there are system updates because the OS is pretty old by now and I've never done an update. But I also don't see a way to do an over-the-air update. The check in the settings says there is no update even though the security check says there has been a security patches available for over a year. Too bad those update problems weren't fixed after causing me so much frustration with the Cosmo Communicator. I'll have to research doing the update manually if I want to keep using Android. (I probably won't though.)

The keyboard backlight still doesn't turn off automatically even though there is an "Auto Keyboard Backlight" setting that seems to affect nothing. Same as with the predecessor. Maybe the setting does something less obvious. But since questions like this are almost never answered and have been ignored for years, it feels pointless to try and find out. While browsing the settings I came across an empty sub-menu. No idea what I'm missing out on and why it's empty/there.

I got the Astro with only Android pre-installed. That option was supposed to become available sooner than the others. I don't intend to use it with Android. But since that's what it has right now, I'm only writing about Android in this entry. There is a Debian variant available from Planet Computers and probably also some mobile OS other than Android, but not officially supported by Planet Computers this time. The Android comes with Planet Computers' own apps and with the Vivaldi browser pre-installed. It's also heavily bloated with Google apps. I assume Google requires this to allow Google Play Store access. Very many permissions are already given to Google apps. As with other Google Androids using Google apps and sending Google all your data feels optional but isn't. The setup after a factory reset was quick and easy. I was basically just asked for a language, that's all. The user is not forced or even asked to sign in to or create a Google account unless one of their apps is opened.

I like the display. It has no high frame rate, no resolution beyond what can be detected with perfect eyesight but also not less. It doesn't have extremely thin borders. The viewing angle is as good as it gets (better than with my recent Google Pixel). Nothing noteworthy about colours. It's a very good display. The pictures that the cameras produce are very bad though. I didn't test it in bright sunlight. I'm sure there's no major problem there. But in normally lit rooms and on a cloudy winter day outside the picture quality is really crappy. Pictures are almost always blurred unless you try really hard not to move at all. And even then all pictures are a collection of blobs created by a noise removal algorithm. Every picture makes it obvious how cheap the camera sensor is. That's what happens when you put 48 megapixels in an area where 8 megapixels could have done a very good job. The front camera actually seems to make better pictures, but not by much. I had to take a picture of the lightbulb in a lamp in order to get a picture that's not a blobby mess. The speakers aren't quite as bad. But they absolutely lack bass. It's like cheap phone speakers from 10 years ago. Not nice for listening to music. But at least you understand what people say if you're in a small and quiet room.

There is a finger print sensor integrated in the power button. But it fails more often than it works and it is delayed. I've regretted trying to use it almost every time I did. It's much less annoying to completely ignore it. That may be the fault of my fingers though. I've trained several of them. But I also have had difficulties with the finger print sensor on my Google Pixel recently. (It says to clean it, but cleaning it doesn't help much/long.) All hardware buttons aside from the keyboard are very soft, leaving the user wondering whether the button press has been recognised when the device's reaction is delayed. It's unpleasant to turn it on with a button press. But I can imagine getting used to the button positioning and feeling.

Buggedibug

There there quite a few things that I noticed that don't work smoothly. Things that might be attributed to the apps that I'm using. But I found it conspicuous how many of bugs I noticed in the first few days of using the device. My guess is that the MediaTek chipset in the Astro Slide is just not supported as well and tested as much as more widely used chipsets. Here are a few things that keep annoying me: Sometimes while playing media, the entire system becomes incredibly slow, reacting very delayed, playing video with less than 1 fps, until rebooted. Sometimes (often) it's just slow, not being able to play an H264 video in 1080p. Sometimes part of the touchscreen isn't working. Sometimes the PIN touch keyboard isn't displayed on the lock screen. Sometimes the notification light lights up or blinks shortly without any reason. F-Droid crashed several times when trying to install some apps. Overall one should expect hiccups like that, sometimes having to use workarounds like rotating the screen when the area of the touchscreen that you want to use isn't working.

This text was not written on the Astro Slide. The keyboard is just too small for long texts for my opinion. But the more I use the device the more I get used to and over its shortcomings. I'll probably try Debian on it and possibly write about that too. Debian worked pretty well on its predecessor.

File Attachments (6 files)
AstroSlide-1.jpg (image/jpeg, 24208 B)
AstroSlide-1.jpg (image/jpeg, 24208 B)
AstroSlide-2.jpg (image/jpeg, 111081 B)
AstroSlide-2.jpg (image/jpeg, 111081 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202855_988.jpg (image/jpeg, 1788634 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202855_988.jpg (image/jpeg, 1788634 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202921_313.jpg (image/jpeg, 4881988 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202921_313.jpg (image/jpeg, 4881988 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202925_505.jpg (image/jpeg, 1429148 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202925_505.jpg (image/jpeg, 1429148 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202932_877.jpg (image/jpeg, 4578378 B)
AstroSlide-IMG_20230116_202932_877.jpg (image/jpeg, 4578378 B)
Comment via email
Entry created on 2022-11-25 (edited 2023-01-06) Authors: steeph (370) Categories: Software (52) Thoughts (72) Web Browsers (5) World Wide Web (10) Languages used: en (255) edit

I remember when Firefox got the new feature to re-open the last closed tab. That was a real useful invention. Do you know what we did before that was possible? … Yes, it was exactly how you imagine it.

I also remember when web browsers didn't have tabs. I'm still not sure whether that was such a good invention after all. Why is there no popular alternative? Opera folded a long time ago with its thumbnail buttons. There are extensions to order, manage and group tabs differently. I think I'd like to try vertical tabs in a bar again for a while. Or just separate windows. Let the window manager manage them. There must be a good reason why every attempt to do that is quickly abandoned. But I'd still like to try it. There are browsers that don't have tabs. But those don't have an engine that I'd like to use for daily web browsing.

It doesn't look like there's any interesting setting to change the tab display in Fitefox.

Comment via email
Go To Navigation Page
Show/Hide Navigation
Mastodon