draft0 - a shared blog by just some people

Go To Navigation
Show/Hide Navigation

Entries tagged 'cat:Computers' (Page 1)

A Really Very Good Laptop

This is a continuation of my recent entry about what I think makes a good laptop.

Display And Keyboard Size

I used to think a larger screen would be better, because you could see things better. But when sitting directly in front of the thing, it doesn't really make a difference whether the screen is 12 or 15 inches across. Larger screens tend to be available with higher resolutions. I think my preference for 15 inch laptops come from a time where there was a notable difference in price between laptops with screens with hardly acceptable and good resolution. But I've come to accept smaller-than-HD resolutions even though there are tasks where it really makes a difference. But with 15 year-old laptops, an HD screen doesn't have to make the thing much more expensive. So there are options, even with 12 inch devices.

The other thing is the keyboard (again). A larger device has more room for a more comfortable keyboard. HP makes use of the extra room. Dell didn't, at the time the laptops I'm interested in were made. In mobile workstations with a 15.6 inch screen can have a numblock, a 14 inch one can be less crowded (no half-size keys, spaced out special keys, extra rows). EliteBooks used to do a good job at that up until the 3rd generation. 12.1 inch Thinkpads (or the newer 12.5 inch ones) are a good example for crowded laptop keyboards. Not a bad keyboard. But there just isn't enough space to include and position all the keys one might want to have where one might want to ghave them. The thing is: 14 and 15 inch ThinkPads and Latitudes use the same keyboard layouts as their 12 inch counterparts. That's another plus for EliteBooks if you want a larger than 12 inch device.

So, since I'm on the ThinkPad bandwagon right now, and somebody gave me a ThinkPad X201 from their scrap box, I think that might be what I'm going to use next. I wouldn't have considered a 12 inch device. But, internals aside, it's just as nice to use as a T400, but ligher and taking up less space. I think if I had been introduced to ThinkPads through an X201, X200 or similar, I would have understood the hype much quicker. I will not go much into other manufacturer's counterparts to the ThinkPad X2xx series. But it is worth mentioning that both HP and Dell had similar devices to the X200/X201 both in clamshell and convertable/talet versions and their keyboards aren't worse. The Dell XP2 has a little fan in me. But those might be a topics for another entry.

Old Case With New Oragns, Frankenpads

I don't have anything agains newer hardware. I'm just not ready to give up on laptop keyboards that feel nice to use. The trend of thinner laptops with larger batteries in recent years has been made possible by smaller mainboards with highly integrated CPUs or SoCs. I imagine that the size of modern laptop keyboards is very helpful if one would decide to build a newer PC into an old laptop case. The X201 doesn't seem to be popular for this anymore. Most people seem to preferr newer models for some reason. I would have thought that is one of the most popular devices for Frankenpads, even if it's a bit more work. The keyboard is of the old style, small case still with a lid latch, but there already was an option for a track pad. I have not gathered too much information about doing this myself. But there seems to be enough resources and support in forums to make it a doable project. But you don't even have to. There is a commercial offer for X201s with 10th generation Core i CPU.

I did think about getting a 486 laptop with a really nice keyboard and mod a newer board into that. It would be a nice project. But not as practical as an X201 or similar. After all, the case would be much thicker. Most 486 laptops were about twice as thick. That would make it easier to fit a different board into it and position connectors in the right spots. Most designs wouldn't have room for a trackpad. The availability of replacement parts for ThinkPads is also a good reason to use a ThinkPad for this. But it would be a nice project. Maybe even with an ultraportable electronic typewriter. But for a laptop to buy, the X2100 si the best compromise for many reasons; and you can get it readily built by someone with experience in doing exactly that.

Comment via email
The Silicon Underground Blog

I don't feel like writing because it feels like work right now. I'm in the transition to a new job. Maybe that's why my brain is fuller than last month. But I resolved to post more regularly here now. So I fall back to a simple trick: I use interesting content that somebody else has created and link to it.

There's this blog about 80s and 90s things, with on of its main focus topics being home and business computers from the 80s up until 1999. It's so interesting to learn more about the tech from back then. Like this article about the AMD Athlon. I loved tinkering with PCs at the time. I loved the Athlon and its successors even more than its predecessors. But reading the article is more than fond tinkering and gaming memories for me because I never knew about the legal surrounding and background of technological developments back then. It was slightly pre my first computer magazine subscription.

The Silicon Underground - David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more

There are a lot of posts about computers and its components, model trains, clothing and fashion, but also other things that should work both as entry points into nostalgic reminiscing and a source for interesting but likely now useless facts.

Comment via email
Cleaning Really Very Dirty Electronics (Old Comuters)

Sometimes I come across an old computer or some other electronic device that doesn't work and is very dirty in some way. Maybe because it had been thrown away in the woods and left there for weeks, maybe because something was spilled on it while its case cover was removed, maybe because it's one of my computers and it was forced to run in my dirty home for too long. No matter what the symptoms are; A dirty PCB can be the cause for almost any type of misfunctioning.

What inspired this post was the fact that one day, Fred refused to turn on again. This time I couldn't blame a cheap power supply. I decided to clean the whole server because it was sitting in a home with nondiscript renovation activities going on for months. It was visibly dirty. Some electronics are designed with all sorts of unusual envirements in mind. Most are not prepared to be exposed to the envirement I lived in at the time, for a prolonged period of time.

Without keeping one specific computer, a specific type of dirt or one specific instance of dirty electronics in mind, the following are the main steps that I consider when I decide to clean a very dirty piece of electronics (mainly PCs).

You may decide to skip any part or any tip if you think it will do no good or even harm your specific device. I wrote this whith the dirtiest computer that I have encountered in my life in mind to cover pretty much all cases.

Checkup And Prevention

To get an idea of how dense the dirt is in various places, you can blow on parts to take away the top layer of dust. I like to use a spray can of compressed gas (often called compressed air or air preassure can) to run not-so-dense dirt out of the corners in which it has been collecting so far. There are great differences in preassure and volume of compressed gas spray cans. From those commonly found at distributors in Germany, I like Balisto best. Any gas spray can with a high preassure will do though. If you have an air compressor you can use that instead. I don't like it because of the noise. But it is cheaper and easier on the enviroment if you do it a lot.

Some people claim that there is no use in blowing on dirty electronics because that will merely redistribute the dirt inside of the device. That is not true if more dirt is blown off of the electronics than there is in the air already. Yes, the dirt gets merely blown onto other surfaces. But those tend to be outside of the device and easier to clean. If you do this to a device regularly before denser dirt builds up, you can prevent having to apply the rest of the steps.

Also, with a smart air circulation concept and clean filters on entry points (sucking fans) dust buildup can be reduced noticably.

Cleaning the surrounding of the device regularly and not letting smokers or hairy pets into the room where the device is running also helps to prevent dirt buildup in the first place.

Notice that high air humidity and nearby plants can attract bugs and spiders, which is nice, but not for electronics. Even PCBs build for the use in the outdoors develop faults if many insects are taking a liking to the warm envirement in the case. That happens mostly if the device is left outside, not moved around much and there are a great variety of different wild plants nearby. Also humidity itself contributes to corrosion in contacts, traces and possibly even wires.

Taking The Device Apart

If it's really dirty, you'll have to take it apart, I'm afraid. You need to reach in all corners and be able to make sure that dirt doesn't get merely transfered into th hardest to reach place of the casing.

To remember which part goes where, you may want to make pictures of the arrangement in the case, of connectors, orientations and marking of things, clips, screws and labeling. If it's not straightforward, make more pictures than you think you'll need. You may realise when putting something back in that two parts look very similar except from one angle, or that the orientation of a connector is not clear. If necessary, label cables and put screws into labeled containers.

Do not forget to remove any batteries. You should do so definitely before applying any liquids. But moist dirt itself can also cause trouble when it touches the wrong spots (which is why the device has to be cleaned in the first place). Commonly in PCs there is a 3 V round cell battery in a clip holder that can easily be taken out. Older devices may have soldered on lithium batteries in various casings and form factors. In modern, small form factor PCs, especially in laptops, the lithium battery also may take various forms and may require soldering to be replaced.

First Brushing

The next step after blowing is brushing. First I take a large soft paint brush and take the majority of the dust off. Its hair are long and soft, so there is no danger to any sort of soldered parts. A few brushes in several directions while holding the board over a trash can should be enough.

Now that the majority of dust has come off, what stays is the stuff that needs more intensive cleaning. If common house dust was all that there was to get rid of and you don't care about looks, you can already power up the device again to see whether the fault has disappeared.

If a more intensive cleaning is necessary, liquid gets involved. There are two ways to continue. One is with a dishwasher (if you have one that allows for the necessary settings) and one without. The latter is more work, of course.

Wet Washing (Dish Washer)

Some people don't want to believe that this technique can be safe because it involves water. But water itself is not dangorous for the PCB, if it dries off before any voltage is applied and before anything starts to corrode. A run in the dishwasher is just the right thing for getting even oily substances or crusted food residue off completely.

The three dangers that dishwashers can pose to PCBs are:

  • Water preassure - This only comes into play if you're using a special industrial dish washer and have certain delicate parts on the PCB. Water preassure is not a problem at all with household washers.
  • Heat - The most important thing is that the dishwasher has a setting to disable drying. All dish washers nowadays dry the dishes after washing them in order to prevent water spots from building. The heat during the drying period may be too high for some parts on the PCB. Dish washers usually also heat up the water in order to be able to reduce the time the dishes have to be let sit wet. Some claim to maintain a water temperature of 95 °C. That may be too hot for some parts on the PCB. If you're not sure about every piece on the PCB, you should reside on the side of caution and not use the dish washer for that PCB. If the device is specified to continuesly operate at an surrounding temperature of 60 °C or more, and you trust that it's still up to that, and you're sure that neither the water nor the air inside the dish washer gets hotter than that, it should be safe enough. Most parts don't have a problem with being heated to that temperature for a short while. But you should make sure that the temperature really doesn't rise above what the setting suggests. There are enough reasons to forget about the dish washer and do it by hand if unsure. The usual advice is to only use a dish washer if it has an option to run a cold wash, without heating up the water. If it offers a run at 30 °C, then that generally is safe also. Note though that the cooler the water is the longer it has to sit to achieve the same effect.
  • Hight/Dimensions - Lastly, of course the board has to fit into the dish washer. If your dish washer has a spindle at the top, make sure it can't collide with anything. The board should be oriented in a way in which the dirtiest or most difficult to clean by hand parts are facing the spindle that squirts out the water. If there are fiddly parts (like slot connector rows, deep heatsinks or forests of capacitors and coils) on both sides of the PCB then you may need to turn it around after one go and wash it again.

Usually PCBs don't have to be washed for as long as dishes with crusted food residue. That means that even without heated water the washing time doesn't have to be increased. But if there actually are crusts of dirt and gooey clumps on there, washing time needs to be significantly longer than it would be with hot water.

Wet Washing (No Dish Washer)

In order to save water, get a tub or a bowl or some similar container large enough to hold all the parts that you're going to wash. Wet the dirty parts with a shower head, catching the water in the tub/bowl. Use warm water no hotter than you would to wash yourself. Put some of the dirtly pieces into the bowl/tub. Add a drop or two of dish soap if you like. Don't use aggressive detergent. If the parts aren't covered with water completely, add more water.

Depending of the type and intensity of the dirt, you may want to keep the parts in water for an hour or even longer. Usually, a few minutes are enough though. When you think the dirt is soaked enough, remove the parts from the dirty water and rinse them with cold, clean water. A bit of preassure may be good. If you have an old shower with no preassure limiter, be careful not to damage sensitive parts, if there are any.

In most cases, PCBs, metal parts, plastic parts, cables and connectors are clean after that. Make sure to let everything dry sufficiantly (see below) before powering anything. If you find than some spots are still dirty, a second and possibly longer bath or a more thorough brushing may be needed.

Instead of letting the parts soak you can also try to brush them with a soft, wet brush, then rinse off the dirt and repeat until no more dirt is removed with the large, soft brush. This may be more convenient if all that is to be cleaned is one PCB. See below for more brushing tips.

Second Brushing

Before you get out the harder brushes or try to rub off remaining dirt with more preassure, inspect all PCBs that you want to brush to see if there are any parts that may be damaged by too much preassure. Pins can be bent, long legs of parts can be bent and even ripped off. Polished dies (heat intensive chips on which a heatsink will be placed) can take damage in the form of scratches. Sockets of modern CPUs need to be covered to protect their pins. If the socket can't be covered securely otherwise, consider just leaving the CPU in. Be careful around these spots and consider covering polished dies with a piece of packaging tape (or the original cover if you still have it and it doesn't cover too much other space).

Small areas of flat surfaces (like unpopulated areas on PCBs) can be cleaned with wet cotton sticks. I recommend them only for the removal of specific blobs of dirt. Cleaning more than a square centimeter or so takes too many sticks. If there are larger flat areas, like on casing parts or on modern ATX boards, use a cotton or microfiber cloth.

Any other area of a PCB, any area that is populated by anything or where there isn't much space bewteen two parts, is better cleaned with brushes. Start with a large, relatively soft brush to sweep and brush large areas at once. Then switch to a smaller, harder brush for any spot that is not sufficiently cleaned by the larger, softer one. That will be many spots. Practically any spot where there is no more than a few millimeters of space between parts. Depending on how dense, how high and in what shape parts are, I switch between the following brushes:

  • Wide, soft paint brush - for larger areas with flat SMD parts only as well as the unpopulated back of a PCB.
  • Narrow, soft paint brush with slightly shortened bristles - for areas between high parts (e.g. between large capacitors or between PCB slots).
  • Small, hard paint brush with very short bristles - This is getting closer to scratching. I use this brush to get grundge out of corners, from under legs or from between flat SMD parts. Do not use this on sensitive connectors, like RAM slots or flat flex connectors unless you need to. If you do, be very careful and only brush in the direction the connector pads are oriented in.
  • Medium-hard toothbrush with cross bristles - I use this one for light scrubbing around all sorts of areas. The crossed bristles really make a difference in getting general dirt out from the corners of tiny SMD parts and from under legs of through-hole parts. When I say scrubbing I mean with almost no preassure. The movemenet in varying directions is what matters.
  • Hard toothbrush - If there are areas that require it, this harder brush continues the scrubbing, with very light preassure. Do not use the hard brush on sensitive connectors like RAM slots or flat flex connectors.
  • Interdental brushes - Although I almost never do this, if you would want to bring the manual cleaning process to an extreme, you can go on using interdental brushes of various sizes to scrub inbween every other mm. On PCBs with many through-hole parts and a lot of solid dirt this may be necessary. But I reckon that if that much afterwork is necessary, the bathing and rinsing before wasn't done thoroughly enough.

After you're done with the process once, you know what sort of brushes you like and can prepare the right set for the next time. Shorten bristles according to your requirements to make paint brushes harder.

After brushing and possibly scrubbing every area of the board, rinse it in the shower again. Repeat brushing and rinsing if necessary.

Other guides on cleaning electronics often include the usage of alcohol and vinegar. So even though I rarely use them just to get off heavy dirt, I'll write about their role a bit. Vinegar is mostly useful to treat spots of light corrosion. Hopefully your board isn't that badly. If it is, cleaning might not be enough to get it working again. Cleaning alcohol (isopropanol with 90 or more % of alcohol) is useful to dissolve substances that don't dissolve easily in water. Depending on the type of extreme dirt you might try insect remover, dish soap, degreaser, silicon cleaner or diluted acid. Be aware though that anything more agressive than soap might attack some parts on the PCB or their casing. Cleaning alcohol has so far been the only thing besides soap to clean off even the most disgusting clumps or dirt. You might consider meths instead isopropanol alcohol because it's way cheaper. Denaturated alcohol will leave a residue of its additives, though. I'm not aware of any consequeces to electronics. I know it is often used as a cheaper alternative to isopropanol alcohol even in professional circles. But YouTubers tend to warn about using it to clean electronics. So, maybe they know why and you should reside on the safe side here. I don't and I'm not aware of any problems it may have caused me.

Connectors are parts you should to look out for specially if after the first round of wet washing you still have hard dirt to brush away. Many modern connectors (their pins or their fixation) are easy to bent with a brush with hard bristles. Some can be ripped off more easily than one may assume. That is the reason I like to treat some connectors longer in a water tub or dish washer than, e.g. casing parts. Cables with flat sheath are best cleaned by soaking in in water for a while, then slowly wiping off dirt by swiping it through a cloth. Depending on the number of centuries the cable has been exposed to heavy dirt, the process might have to be repeated a couple of times for each centimeter of the cable from every angle. Especially wite cables might take a dozen or more times of swiping with 10 minutes of soaking in between. Mash cable sleees, if they are really dirty, might take some brusing with a hard brush with small bristles after they have been soaked in water enough.

Drying

Before the electronics can be powered they need to dry, of course. There are a few things that can be overlooked though. If a board looks dry on the surface that doesn't necessarily mean that every part of it is dry enough already.

Coils and some other parts can hold water for days if they were drenched. If there are any on the board, a day long dry should be the minimum; Two days if you want to be sure and don't apply any drying methods. Dense connectors can hold quite a lot of water even if the rest of the board already completely dry. It may be necessary to blow them dry even after a day of waiting.

Because of my work and living situation, I often don't come back to the device for days anyway. So I just leave it in a slightly ventilated spot for 5 days or a week until putting the device back together. If you don't want to wait that long, consider the following.

  • Leave the parts in a well ventilated and dry spot in a position where only small surfaces/corners are touching anything other than air. Things will not dry otherwise and you may get a new problem with corrosion.
  • Position a fan to blow on or past the parts, especially PCBs, in a way that it can be left unattended. Even a small computer fan at low speed does a lot. A room fan set to 11 does more. But don't use a room heater to blow hot air directly at the parts.
  • Use a hair dryer on low or cold setting to blow parts dry quicker. This speeds up the drying process a lot. But don't expect wonders after one minute. You still need to give it some time. Don't come too close with a hot hair dryer and don't use the high setting unless you hold it apart a meter or so to dry a large bunch of parts.
  • If the weather allows for it, you can use solar energy to dry parts quicker. If there is nothing among them that you don't want to be exposed to UV light a lot, leave them outside in the sun for a few hours. In really hot weather, check the temperatur of the surface first and regularly. It might be too hot for some parts. Don't use glass or mirrors to increase temperature.
  • In general, what's best is slightly above room temperature (more heat doesn't do all that much but can damage some parts) and continued ventilation (the more the quicker).
  • To prevent water spotting make sure to use soft water (low amount of chalk in it), filter it if necessary. Cleaning alcohol can also help to prevent spots during the drying process.

    If you grow impatient, make sure to withstand the idea to try and use a heater. Don't place the electronics on top of a heater, don't have a heatgut point directly, at it. If you use a radiator, use it to heat the room, not the electronics first.

    Finishing And Testing

    When you are happy with the result of the cleaning process and you are sure that all the parts have dried sufficiently, you might rush and power the PCB up to see how it does. But you also might want to take the time to check whether you have damaged anything, bent any radially mounted party or connector pins. Depending on the original finish and the age of the PCB the now perfectly clean part may look astonishingly well or boring. If you want to show off your machine or sell the PCB. you might want to apply your own finishing by spraying the board with silicon spray. There are oils that advertise being best for this purpose. But I don't agree. An evenly distributed silicon coat looks best in pictures and in person. A spray can with a good nozzle allows for an evenly distributed, thin coat. Don't allow for drops to form. If you can't get it evenly distributed or your can spits, apply a bit more than enough and use a large brush with soft bristles (the one you started out with for the manual cleaning process) and brush the board in random and all sorts of directions to make it look evenly distributed.

Comment via email
Single-Purpose Computers

A general-purpose computer is a technical term that describes a device by the capabilities its components enable it to make use of in principle. A turing-complete machine. A "smart" washing machine with a touch screen, internet connection and a CPU fast enough to run Doom may be considered a general-purpose computer even though you may only want to use it for one purpose. So, it practice it's a single-purpose device, with a computer. It is this sense in which I have developed a fondness for single-purpose devices. Nowadays, these devices often end up having a computer inside them. But that doesn't mean that it makes sense to either run software other than the one provided for the single purpose on it or replace it with an (already existing) PC/laptop/smartphone/tablet/whatever. I reckon it's fun to hack household devices to run arbitrary code on them, get Linux to run on a calculator or build a botnot of smart fridges to mine bitcoins. But for daily use and the simplicity of it in daily life, I find reliable software that serves a single purpose well, soothing, comforting and simpla practical. Turn on the device, select what it should do, go. I could do without all the complexity that in modern electronics that serve mainly the developers (or their bosses need for a cheap and quick, flexible complex system).

I think many users of modern "smart" household devices would agree. But my preference for single-pupose devices goes further. My laptop and my desktop PC are connected to several home servers and NAS. It's cool to have an MPD server, an always-online, logging IRC client, a LAN-centric torrent client that runs independently from the actual terminal devices that you use. It's practical and clearly has its purposes. But, after working a more than full-time job for years, I've learned to pay tribute to the simplicity, lack of maintenance requirements and reliability of computers that are used to do just one thing. This is different from the Unix-philosophy of doing just one thing and doinf it well. I'm not talking about standardised interfaces between software components. I think that the advantages of a general-purpose media center in the form of a computer have made us overlook the advantages of standalone devices that serve a single purpose. You might have a CD or record player for music, a DVD player for movies, a notebook with a good keyboard for notes or a diary, a thin laptop or tablet for casual web browsing, a Play Station for gaming. Turn it on and it runs. No complicated and long boot process, no chance a software update might interrupt you or have broken something. Hardware buttons for the specific functions the device has. And, if a device breaks, the other ones still work.

I have askey myself why. But I really don't know why I preferr CDs over a music collection on a hard disk. It's just so much more fun to choose an album and put in the disc. Without planning to, I have started to segragate my devices more and more over the last couple of years. I have a PC for retro gaming, one for OS experiments, and so on. Doing those things in VMs is out of the question for me. Again I don't know why. But it really feels much better to have a dedicated device for some things.

Comment via email
The Bad Web

A lot has been written about the declining usablity of the World Wide Web due to web sites not respecting what visitors really want or need. So I'll just summarise here before I'll try to get to the point.

Megabytes of CSS and JS to display 15 Kilobytes of content and another few megabytes of ads and other bloat. It has become completely normal to have a hundret and more tracking cookies installed for wisiting a single web page. Many popular sites can't be read by at least some people because the distracting ads have become too much. Thise are the first major problems that come to my mind. Depending on who you ask the problematic development has started in the last couple of years, about a decade ago, in the mid-2000s or even in the 1990s. But most people above a necessary age to have experienced the difference seem to agree that the web experience was a better one in 2005 than today. Back then RSS was integrated by many popular sites. You could use it to read Twitter and subscribe to YouTube channels, for example, and sites that still offer it in the background used to place links to feeds visibly, not hidden in the source code for browser extensions to discover them. Web browsers themselves could not only display RSS feeds but placed an icon next to the address bar when a feed for the currently viewed page was available. RSS is often used to show how the web was more open in general. Even commercial web sites were created with a more open approach. A site were you had to register before you could view its content was an exception for which privacy was the reason, not monetary expectation or greed. This is the time to which most people seem to want to return to. When I say most people, I mean most people whose thoughts on the open web I read, which is those who post to the open web and are interested in such things to a degree that they want to write about it. So what I probably mean is "most people who are dissatisfied with the current state of the web". It's possibly that most people, or most internet users, love the way things are going now and hate the ideas advocated of the open web have, whether that is for or against their own good.

Sometimes I boost thought-out or new takes on the subject, well formulated demands or promotions of software solutions on the fediverse. And I often think about this myself. Because the web has brought me so many nice things and I want it to be a positive thing in society as well, which, overall, it doesn't seem to be anymore. What does the web need to make it better again?

First of all, the open web isn't gone, nor has it shrunk in size. There way more personal blogs, open networks and non-commercial projects out there than 20 years ago. Even new web forums open all the time. But it's less visible below the very very loud, commercial web. Maybe the greedy web is a good name for what I mean. Not every commercial web site is an example of how the web is devdeloping in a bad direction in my view. I want to be able to get information about a business from the business-owner themselves when I'm interested in their services, for example.

A search engine that returns links to non-commercial sites first, unless you really need information that can only be found on a page of a greedy site. I think- let's just not talk about the many problems (not even just challanges) that such a search engine would introduce if it is to be useful in practice.

A browser that only links to non-bloated/non-tracking/non-greedy/open web sites or warns when a link leads to a less-nice site. Again, I don't have the time right now to list all the problem that there would be if an attempt to implement this would be made. Maybe I'll write another entry about my deeper thoughts on the technological solutions that I mention here. But these thoughts don't contain any real solutions. So I don't know.

Create a literal small web, that only uses resources from and only links to, web sites that are following the same standard (e.g. only (X)HTML4, maybe only CSS2, possibly restriction on JS usage). That is in principle similar to building a whole new network, as is Gemini and Gopher doing. (I know Gopher isn't new, but I reckon the majority of sites is.) I forgot what other protocols with similar aims are there. As far as I know none that are widely used. There are initiatives to restrict the WWW to a smaller or older set of standards. Those probably influence site builders (mainly in personal web sites), but won't change the web as a hole. And so you'll eventually while browsing come across a site that doesn't restrict itself it what it's linking to, or you'll catch yourself linking to a bloated site because it's important to link to the original source of something.

JavaScript needs to be optional again. I've recently come to think that this is actually the one major goal among the technological changes that the current web would need to undergo in order to make it user-friendly and more usable again. In a time where you couldn't 100% expect that visitors were using a client that understood JavaScript, and had it enabled, web developers didn't have much of a choice and built in fallbacks so that a site was still usable without JavaScript. But the number of visiting clients without very good JavaScript became so small that it started to look optional, and in reality became not only optional but even rare, that fallbacks are included. JavaScript really took over the web. I could make so many words around this but don't have much time left this morning. Not only are there sites that are empty without JS loading the entire HTML. Such a thing isn't even special anymore.

If you are creating a new web browser, please include a switch in the GUI that allows to enable/disable JavaScript permanently (until deliberately switched on again) either entirely or for the currently viewed site. Or, maybe make it off by default.

tbd:this entry needs some links;write follow-up entries

Comment via email
Alternative Web Browser Engines

I don't think I have to spell out the problem with the current shape of the web browser landscape in detail. Almost every HTTP client uses one of the now three big engines, WebKit, Blink and Gecko. Blink, as the big bad Google one is definitely one that nobody should consciously choose to use. Not everybody trusts WebKit much more because it is developed by another powerful global player that inadvertently collects more data in one hand than can be considered healthy, Apply. And Gecko, the one developed by Mozilla has been criticises for being pushed into a direction that is less free and user-friendly than it is expected from Mozilla. Since Mozilla has received large sums in funding from Google for a while it can be argued that any recent fork of the engine has a history of being influenced by Google. All the other large engines are no longer developed and thus not seen as a possible choice for the future. But there are some options to be discussed for users who want to avoid using a browser that relies on one of the big engines. And there are signs that the lack of competitive differences in browser engines will be reduced in the coming decade.

I like that the recent financial development in the SerenityOS/Ladybird project has prompted discussions about alternative browser engines and has shone some light on upcoming new browser engines written from the ground up. The interest in a new kid on the block has been growing over the last couple of years. So it should not surprise that several projects are undergoing and aim to create alternatives to the current big three browser engines. But in my eyes most of them are still not well-known enough. Not all are equaly useful. So I've decided to mention some options that could replace a mainstream browser at least in some use case.

Using Old Browsers

Yes, I'm covering the less practicle options, too. Using an old browser with security issues that won't be fixed not only might add security holes in the system it is used on, it also doesn't do anything to tackle the problem. The development of browser engines that are used in newer releases will not be affected by some people using them less. Choosing an older browser merely sends a signal and possibly changes statistics to look like you now also forget updating for a long time. But there is range of different lightweight browsers with engines that have no trouble with HTML4 and CSS2 and also offer good JavaScript support. KHTML (Konqueror) becomes an option again, Internet Explorer with Trident or EdgeHTML could get another chance and an old Opera with Presto could continue to shine. But you might need to maintain an envirement of outdated libraries to make your choice over a long time.

Flow

The Flow browser with its own HTML engine is developed by ekioh, a company with experience in developing browser for various embedded devices. As a free product, the preview of a Raspberry Pi version is available. But browsers for all major operating systems are planned. It uses an existing JavaScript engine the JS support is better than with other newly written browser engines. But it also doesn't add as much competition in the market in this regard. I have not tested Flow. As a product from a commercial business it didn't look interesting enough, yet, even though it is reportedly relatively mature.

Haphaestus

The Haphaestus TV Browser is a project by Adrian Cochrane that forms a web browser specifically aimed to be easily navigated with with few buttons (like on a TV remote control). It is a very interesting project because it is made up from several individual parts (CSS engine, font rendering, box layout engine, …) that all are written from the ground up in Haskell. A JavaScript engine is not part of the project. The web is nowadays more pleasant to browse without JS anyway. Adrian also recently started a free year-long course that encourages others to write their own HTML rendering engine (surely with the intention to collect experience for future paid programming courses).

Goanna

Of the browsers that use the Goanna engine, I see Pale Moon recommended most often. Goanna is a fork of Gecko that, by now, differes in features from the current gecko engine. It looks like Goanna may be the way to keep using a relatively old engine that supports all majer web standards very well with an actively developed browser that runs reliably in the OS of your choice. It may not be performing as well as current Gecko browsers like LibreWolf, but there's supposedly a smaller chance that their developers have been influenced by payments from Google.

Dillo

Small, realy light-weight, very simple and currently with no intention to pay any attention to scripts. Older versions of Dillo had been ported to many other systems. The current version 3 is only developed for the now big OSs (Linux, BSD, OS X). But it is very light-weight and snappy compared to mainstream browsers. CSS support is still lacking in the eyes of users who are used to every positional property to work. (Float support is also still missing.)

LibWeb, LibJS

The Ladybird web browser is becoming more known now that a company has been formed around it that has been promised major funding for the next few years. The project started as "the web browser of SerenityOS" but has since gained indipendent support and in turn supported hope that a novel web browser with a new engine will be established on the market of web browsers in the near future. The libweb and libjs libraries were started to build an intependent engine behind Ladybird. An application that will be seen as a usable alternative to Firefox in daily use with no need to fall back on another browser is still far away though.

NetSurf

Another small web browser that good HTML, CSS and JS support is NewSurf. LibDOM, LibCSS and Duktape (JavaScript) are combined to create a simple and portable browser. NetSurf can be found on Atari, Haiku, Linux, RISC OS and other systems. I've also found it a few times on my journay through alternative operating systems (about which I still have to write in this blog). It's the portable, small browser.

Servo

This is one that I like a lot personally. A noval web engine written in Rust. There is currently no full-fledged browser application that uses it. But there is a GUI demo that allows to test the engine with any URL. In my experience, web sites with elaborate design that make use of different layout rules and a lot of JavaScript tend to render better with Servo than with a current Ladybird (LibWeb, LibJS). Support for CSS3 rules is also better than with the small browsers NetSurf and Dillo. The potential is more readibly visible with this one compared to other new projects. Maybe the fact that browsers based on Servo only exist for specific devices is responsible for it being less known than Ladybird. No wonder Mozilla sucks up Serve during their project to replace parts of Gecko with re-implementations in Rust. I guess eventually there will be no big difference between the two engines.

Text-based web browsers are probably not an option for most users. Most web sites are designed for a graphic layout only and even when a page is structured well and can be read with a screen reader, sighted people usually prefer a GUI to a text-based interface. But if you want or a use case requires it, text browsers like links2 or lynx are also worth checking out, of course. Another thing that I'd like to mention here because it could be considered an alternative web browser are auditory browsers. But this entry is meant to be about browser engines, not browsers. Otherwise there would be many more projects that I should mention (browsers with a small user base, forks of Firefox, browsers for quick keyboard use).

Edit: Here's an interesting chart about the live of web browser engines since the first one in 1990.

Comment via email
Pinkie Pie Laptop Back Light Mod

I once had an HP Compaq 6710b. A typical 15 inch business laptop from 2014: A Core2 Duo, 4 GB, thick and reliable. Thin laptops are nice. But I like about thick, older laptops how well they took a fall on a hard object or a hit with a hard object. There used to be a thick plastic cover followed by an even thicker layer of space before the backlight and the actual LCD panel start. Enough room to make all sorts of fun case mods easy.

Those were the laptop screen covers.

So, what I wanted to do is put a piece of transparent plastic in there, engrave something onto it and light is with colouful LEDs from the side to make the engraved lines light up.

This is the type of look that I initially had in mind. The light from the LEDs enters the sheet from the side and becomes visible to somebody viewing from the front, in places where it is refracted by a rough spot.

I removed the cover and used a Dremel-like tool with a thin burr to cut along a line that I had drown on with a felt pen. But before I continued I learned that the way the LCD backlight apparently works is that it not only lights through a diffusor sheet to cover the whole LCD evenly, but also towards the back, where the light gets reflected by a sheet of aluminium back towards the front. So, in order to make the whole light up pink, as I intended, I had to cover the backlight first so the white light from the backlight wouldn't drown out my pink LEDs. I decided to go the easier way and use the white light and forget about my pink LEDs.

The piece that I cut out. (The scrap.)

After I had cut out the hole in the back cover in the shape that I wanted, I put the cover back on the screen to see how the image looks with a whole in the back cover. I couldn't notice any spots or any difference to before whatsoever. So instead of thinking of a way to mount the LEDs and bring a wire up to them, I found a pink piece of transparent plastic (a slim CD case), cut out a piece a bit larger than the hole that I made in the cover, and engraved my picture into that.

White shines the light of the back. Of the light shines back the white shine. Shine of white light shines back the shine. Shine, shine, white light; back of the shine, the shine. Shine shine the shine shine of the back light white shine.

I don't remember exactly why. But additionally to the pink plastic with Pinkie Pie engraved into, I put in a piece of linen-ish cloth. That's where the line structure comes from.

This is how it looks like after glueing both pieces onto the inside of the screen cover and putting the cover back on.

And this is how it looks like turned in, from the view of someboding sitting across of the opened laptop, looking at the back cover of the screen.

I used this laptop for some more time, then gave it away when I got a new one. (I think it was because the keyboard started to fail and I felt it was time for a new one.)

That was the first anything that I engraved into a plastic sheet with the intention to light it. Next in the evolution of me engraving things into sheets of plastic with the intention of lighting them are these LED pictures of My Little Ponies

File Attachments (6 files)
Comment via email
This SGI Indigo
Comment via email
Mastodon